- Abbr. Title:
- ISAR J Sci Tech
- ISSN(Online):
- 2584-2056
- Publisher:
- ISAR Publisher
- Chief Editor:
- Dr. Shashi Kant Gupta
- Country of origin:
- India
- Language:
- English
- Frequency:
- Monthly
- Format:
- Online
- Journal starting year:
- 2023
Ethics & Policies
Ethical Guidelines
At ISAR Publisher, we are committed to upholding the highest standards of ethics in publishing. Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to adhere to the following ethical guidelines:
1. Authors’ Responsibilities
- Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their submitted work is original and free from plagiarism. Any use of the work and/or words of others must be appropriately cited.
- Data Integrity: Authors should present accurate data and results. Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting of data is strictly prohibited.
- Multiple Submissions: Manuscripts must not be submitted to more than one journal simultaneously. Duplicate submissions are considered unethical.
- Authorship: Only individuals who have significantly contributed to the research and writing should be listed as authors. All co-authors must approve the final version of the paper.
- Conflicts of Interest: Authors must disclose any financial or personal relationships that could influence their work.
2. Reviewers’ Responsibilities
- Confidentiality: Manuscripts under review must be treated as confidential documents and not shared or discussed with others.
- Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively, with constructive feedback provided to improve the manuscript.
- Conflict of Interest: Reviewers should decline to review manuscripts where they have conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors or institutions.
- Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews within the specified timeframe.
3. Editors’ Responsibilities
- Fairness: Editors must evaluate manuscripts based solely on academic merit, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.
- Confidentiality: Editors must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and publisher.
- Decision-Making: Editors are responsible for deciding which articles will be published, based on the reviewers’ evaluations and the journal’s editorial policy.
- Addressing Misconduct: Editors must take responsive measures when ethical complaints are presented concerning a submitted or published manuscript.
4. Ethical Oversight
ISAR Publisher is committed to investigating all allegations of ethical misconduct. We follow COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines when handling such issues, ensuring that appropriate action is taken, which may include retraction or correction of the published work.
Policies
Peer Review Policy
All manuscripts submitted to ISAR Journals undergo a rigorous double-blind peer-review process. Reviewers evaluate the quality, significance, and originality of the work, providing valuable feedback to authors.
Open Access Policy
ISAR Publisher is committed to open access publishing to ensure that research is freely accessible to the global community. Authors retain copyright, and articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Data Sharing and Reproducibility
Authors are encouraged to share data and code associated with their manuscripts to facilitate transparency and reproducibility. ISAR Publisher supports the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles.
Plagiarism Detection
To maintain the integrity of published work, ISAR Publisher employs plagiarism detection tools. Any suspected cases of plagiarism will be thoroughly investigated, and appropriate actions will be taken.
Corrections and Retractions
ISAR Publisher follows COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines for corrections and retractions. Corrections are made for minor errors, while retractions are issued for serious ethical violations or major inaccuracies.
Editorial Independence
The editorial team maintains independence from external influences, ensuring fair and unbiased decision-making in all aspects of the journal's operations.
Contact Us
For any questions or concerns related to ethics and policies, please contact our editorial team at [contact@isarpublisher.com].
This system extends Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) to two correlated assets with constant initial prices captures co-movement via correlation. Results show that common shocks create co-movement, while bank-specific components and ρ determine the degree of divergence and systemic risk. Existence and uniqueness of a strong solution is proved using multidimensional SDE theory, yielding explicit solutions for. The system is used to quantify diversification benefits and joint tail risk within the banking sector. This section models the joint future share price dynamics of Access Bank and First Bank using a 2-asset coupled GBM framework. Finally, we present graphical results which represent the behavior of the economic investments and discuss the effect of the relevant parameters.
This system models the stock price of a bank using Geometric Brownian Motion(GBM) with a deterministic seasonal initial condition. The Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) is formulated to capture annual dividend, earnings, and macroeconomic cycles in the Nigerian banking sector. Three sample paths are simulated examines the future share price dynamics of First Bank under a seasonal Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) framework using three figures. The analysis considers stochastic Brownian paths, deterministic seasonal cycles, and sensitivity to amplitude parameter A. Results show that while seasonality drives recurring patterns, random shocks and amplitude changes determine short-term dispersion and volatility. Under Lipschitz and linear growth conditions, existence and uniqueness of a strong solution is proved via Itô’s Lemma, yielding. To this end, the model provides a framework for timing entry and exit around quarterly results.
Many institution-level credential-verification systems generate a random-looking reference code and treat it as secure by virtue of being unique, without examining whether that code is actually resistant to guessing. This paper re-examines a deployed reference-number scheme built for the Academic Document Verification System at Northwest University (NWU), Kano, and shows that its uniqueness suffix - four hexadecimal characters drawn from a UUID4 - carries only 16 bits of entropy (65,536 possible values). We show analytically and by Monte Carlo simulation that, while the system's retry-on-collision loop guarantees no reference is ever issued twice, the same 16-bit space can be exhaustively enumerated against the public verification endpoint in under 11 minutes at a modest 100 requests per second, since no rate limiting is applied. We then design, specify, and analyse a drop-in replacement: an HMAC-SHA256-derived tag computed over the year, document-type, department, and a monotonic serial number, keyed by a server-side secret. At a 48-bit truncation this raises brute-force exhaustion time to an estimated 89,000 years under the same attack rate, at a measured computational cost of 3.2 microseconds per generation or verification - statistically negligible against the system's sub-second query latency. The two schemes are compared against manual, QR-code-based, blockchain-anchored, and zero-knowledge credential-verification approaches reported in the literature on a five-dimension feature matrix, supplemented by a quantitative verification-time comparison. The system was validated through 34 functional test cases (100% pass rate) and an exploratory, formative user-acceptance evaluation (n=8; overall satisfaction 4.5-4.8/5.0, not powered for statistical inference), in which security confidence was the lowest-rated criterion - a finding consistent with, though not statistically proof of, the entropy weakness this paper identifies and addresses. The contribution of this paper is therefore not the verification system as an artefact, but a transferable method for quantifying and closing the guessability gap in identifier-based credential-verification schemes generally.
Miniature hearing aids operate under severe constraints in volume, mass, battery capacity, acoustic performance, moisture resistance, and user comfort. This paper investigates whether otherwise dissipated mechanical motion associated with the ear canal and temporomandibular joint can be converted into supplementary electrical energy by piezoelectric transduction. The study uses a physics-based contemporary review and conceptual engineering analysis. Direct piezoelectric constitutive relations, transducer capacitance, open-circuit voltage, time-varying power, mechanical strain energy, resonance, acoustic intensity, storage energy, and end-to-end efficiency are used to establish a quantitative framework. Published in-ear studies demonstrate that jaw-related ear-canal deformation is a measurable mechanical energy source and that flexible PVDF structures can generate electrical output in the microwatt range under defined conditions. A free-field acoustic calculation also shows why ordinary sound alone is a weak source for a hearing-aid-sized capture area. Literature from 2024-2026 emphasizes flexible PVDF-based harvesters, mechanically amplified structures, MEMS integration, and ultra-low-power power-management circuits. The proposed architecture combines a compliant piezoelectric transducer, low-loss rectification, energy buffering, an ultra-low-power power-management unit, and micro-storage or an auxiliary load. The analysis does not support continuous full self-powering of the hearing aid; the more defensible near-term application is battery support, gradual energy accumulation, or intermittent operation of low-power auxiliary electronics. The governing physics establishes plausibility, while experimental validation remains necessary to determine the net energy benefit in a real device.
This system presents the classical Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) benchmark with constant initial price. The Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) assumes no deterministic trend, seasonality or regime effects. The simulation results for Fidelity Bank share prices were presented using a constant GBM model with varying sample paths. Four graphical solutions were analyzed to examine path behavior, expected growth, and sensitivity to drift and volatility. The results highlight the interaction between deterministic trend and stochastic noise in shaping Fidelity’s price dynamics. The model serves as a benchmark for market efficiency with no deterministic trend. Also, the existence and uniqueness of the strong solution is proved under standard Lipschitz conditions. This system serves as the null model for comparing the other stochastic systems.
