This research explores the lack of mediation and reunification for victims of broken homes and their families and seeks to sort the laid down support systems from the Canadian social care support systems. Reunification can be described as a roundtable involving the child and caregiver, trying to bring restoration and solutions to families disrupted by child welfare. Reunification is an ambiguous concept and reality, as it is open to multiple interpretations. This paper dissect and digest the elements of broken homes, how reunification is essential but lacking in most situations and how it is a psychological relief for both victims, families using the Canadian social care support systems. Bringing methodologies and theories together makes room for flexibility around research goals. That principle can be translated in to practice by talking about and prioritizing symbiotic frameworks. If frameworks are made intersectional and connective with one another and phenomena outside of themselves (phenomenology), then, coalitions and solidarities can take place. Alliances reduce vulnerabilities to poverty, homelessness, trauma, by forging links and connectivity amongst people and across differences This paper centers on the social welfare system and philosophical underpinnings of processes systems use to transition victims of broken homes back to their families using support systems and regulations brining about an efficient universal reunification.