Purpose: This study aims to explore the perceptions and attitudes of doctors towards robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), focusing on its perceived effectiveness, advantages, challenges, and factors influencing its adoption. Understanding these aspects is crucial for guiding future implementation and training programs in the medical field. Methodology:A structured questionnaire was distributed to a sample of 40 doctors. The survey captured demographic data and responses to various questions regarding the effectiveness, advantages, disadvantages, sufficiency of training, factors influencing adoption, and future usage intentions of RAS. Data were analyzed to identify key trends and insights. Findings:The results reveal that a majority of doctors (52.5%) perceive RAS as more effective than traditional surgical methods, with increased precision (42.5%) and less invasiveness (35%) being highlighted as primary advantages. However, high cost (60%) and a steep learning curve (15%) were identified as significant challenges. While 40% of respondents found current training programs to be neutral, 32.5% deemed them insufficient. Key factors influencing adoption include better patient outcomes (42.5%) and institutional support (20%). Notably, 62.5% of doctors indicated a likelihood of continuing or starting to use RAS in the future. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: This study contributes to the theoretical understanding of technology adoption in healthcare by highlighting the specific perceptions and attitudes of medical professionals towards RAS. Practically, it underscores the need for enhanced training programs and institutional support to mitigate the challenges associated with RAS adoption. From a policy perspective, the findings advocate for investment in RAS infrastructure and training, alongside measures to address cost-related barriers, ensuring broader and more effective integration of RAS into surgical practice.